At Mass yesterday Father remarked that it is not the heart but
the crucifix which is the real symbol of love.
A truism, perhaps, for a practicing Catholic, but one worth repeating to
oneself from time to time.
I
am working on a dissertation that deals—in a more direct fashion than I
expected it would when I began—with the clash of medieval and Renaissance views
of nature and society, or natural and human law. The older medieval view was that nature and
natural law were responsible for much of what was good in man; in the high Renaissance
this view was sometimes warped into a Pelagian worship of man-as-natural being,
in much the same way that post-Cartesians worshipped
man-as-thinking-thing. One of the many
facets of the Protestant Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation was a
reaction to this excessive Renaissance optimism. Thus reformers of both stripes and secular
Renaissance skeptics joined in emphasizing the insufficiency of human nature
for salvation, and perhaps even for social and political life. The later, Hobbesian view of a warlike state
of man has real connection to the strong Calvinist notion of man as totally
depraved.
Between
their ideas and the Platonic-Aristotelian image of simple shepherds, devastated
by the elements and bonding together to ensure survival for themselves and
their families, gapes a wide gulf. For
the ancients and medievals nature was lively and dangerous, and human beings
bonded together to find their natural place in it. But beginning with the early modern era,
nature became subject to the conquering techne
of man, while human beings themselves became less and less worthy of trust and
less and less natively inclined to order.
Who
is right? Both; neither; I’ll get back
to you on that. I have strong sympathies
with the older view, of course; but … This much I will grant to the modern
view. On a day-to-day level, mere human
virtue however advanced seems to be but rarely sufficient to deal with the trials
and tribulations of ordinary life.
Too
bad I wrote an undergraduate thesis arguing in the opposite direction!
But
the older I become, the more convinced I am that sanctity is necessary not
merely for entry into heaven, but also to live a tolerably happy life on earth. At a certain point after being woken up for
countless times in the middle of the night, nature is no longer sufficient;
supernature becomes necessary. The heart
will always remain, but it can only beat on the blood of the cross.
No comments:
Post a Comment